This voting process is biased towards larger orgainsations who can mobilise email lists etc. It is also biased towards wealthier organisations who have members and supporters that are on line. A lot of poor or small, but worthy groups thus missout.
Ian
Need some advice on any aspect of digitisation or digital content creation? Ask your questions in this forum... or jump in with your own answers to other peoples questions.
Comments
Hi Ian,
We’re not sure if you’re talking about the Make it Digital Award or the Voting Tool in general?
If you were referring to the Make it Digital Award:
The responses on the Voting Tool will just be one aspect of the Award evaluation. Judges will consider people’s comments about why the proposal is of value to them, they’ll look at who is commenting and they will be sure not to disadvantage examples that may not attract a huge number of votes or comments because, for example, they are in low population areas. We are looking for quality and relevance, not quantity. Also, the other award criteria will be very important in the evaluation:
We have answered this and other Frequently Asked Questions on the Make it Digital Award page: http://makeit.digitalnz.org/about/award/
If you were referring to the Make it Digital Voting Tool in general then refer to our Voting Tool FAQ page which explains the purpose of the tool: http://makeit.digitalnz.org/about/about-the-voting-tool/
In short, the Make it Digital Voting Tool is a way for people to communicate their need for NZ digital content. It gives a voice to people who need digital content, and a gentle flag to content providers that there is a need.